Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 17;50(5):842–855. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0405-1

Table 2.

The interaction effect of storage environment and varieties on the moisture content (%) of pepper fruits during 28 days of storage

Storage Treatments/Cultivars Storage periods (days)
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
Evaporative Cooling
 Melka Dima 91.7a 91.5ab 91.1a 90.4a 89.8a 89.0a 88.7a 86.4
 Melka Eshet 92.5a 92.3a 91.1a 89.7a 89.4a 88.0a 87.7ab 84.0
 Melka Zala 91.1abc 89.9abc 90.4ab 85.6bc 87.7ab 88.6a 88.0ab 86.6
 Mareko Fana 89.8bc 88.9cde 88.7bc 87.2bc 86.7abc 85.4b 84.8bc 83.4
 PBC 600 89.4c 88.1de 87.4cd 86.9bc 86.6abc 85.2b 83.7c 82.8
Ambient storage
 Melka Dima 91.7a 88.2cd 86.1d 86.8bc 85.1abc
 Melka Eshet 92.5a 89.5bc 89.3ab 86.7ab 83.8bc
 Melka Zala 91.1abc 85.5def 86.6cd 85.6c 84.1c
 Mareko Fana 89.8bc 86.7def 84.7de 83.2d 78.9d
 PBC 600 89.4c 84.5f 83.6e 84.4d 75.0d
Significance * ** ** ** *** ** ** ns
SE ± 0.50 0.30 0.25 0.47 0.52 0.48 1.05 1.06
LSD (0.05) 1.70 1.60 1.74 1.71 2.84 1.55 3.41 3.74
CV (%) 0.50 0.60 0.49 0.93 1.06 0.94 2.09 2.18

(n = 3)

Means within a column followed by the same letter (s) are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05; ns *, **, *** indicate non significant, significant difference at P ≤ 0.05, 0.01 or 0.001, respectively. The data from day 16 onwards is meant for the evaporatively cooled storage only