Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Oct;79(5):686–696. doi: 10.1037/a0024813

Table 3.

Group cohesion and helping alliance scores

Variable Standard care CM Significance test value (df), p-value Effect size Cohen’s d
Week 1 n = 89 n = 87
 Group cohesion 114.3 ± 17.0 119.5 ± 15.1 t (174) = 2.11, p < .04 .32
 Helping alliance 88.7 ± 13.5 94.4 ± 12.2 t (175) = 2.93, p < .01 .44
Month 1 n = 73 n = 84
 Group cohesion 113.5 ± 14.6 120.6 ± 17.5 t (155) = 2.73, p < .01 .44
 Helping alliance 87.3 ± 17.3 96.7 ± 13.0 t (149) = 3.78, p < .001 .61
Month 2 n = 34 n = 42
 Group cohesion 114.4 ± 18.1 118.7 ± 17.3 t (73) = 1.04, p = .30 .24
 Helping alliance 89.5 ± 13.0 95.4 ± 15.1 t (71) = 1.77, p = .08 .42

Note: Sample sizes are based on patients remaining in group treatment session at each time point and completing the questionnaires; degrees of freedom differ at time points based on some incomplete assessments. CM=contingency management