Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 29;63(613):e554–e562. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X670688

Table 3.

Effects of an educational intervention in general practice on the number of older patients being exposed to ≥PIP, mean number of PIPs per 100 older patients, and mean number of PIPs per 100 prescriptions

Group Patients (%) exposed to one or more PIPs PIPs per 100 patients (95% CI)a PIPs per 100 prescriptionsb (95% CI)
Intervention group
  Baseline 9278 (19.9) 27.3 (24.9 to 29.6) 2.3 (2.2 to 2.4)
  Follow-up 7655 (16.9) 22.4 (21.2 to 23.8) 1.8 (1.7 to 1.9)
  Reduction −1623 (−3.0) −4.9 (−5.8 to − 3.9) −0.5 (−0.6 to −0.4)

Control group
  Baseline 6427 (18.6) 25.8 (23.4 to 28.1) 2.2 (2.0 to 2.2)
  Follow-up 5977 (17.2) 24.2 (22.8 to 25.6) 1.9 (1.8 to 2.0)
  Reduction −450 (−1.4) −1.6 (−2.6 to −0.6) −0.3 (−0.4 to −0.2)

Change due to interventionc
  Absolute −1173 (−1.6) −3.3 (−4.6 to −1.9) −0.3 (−0.4 to−0.2)
  Relative (%) −8.1 −12.1 (−16.8 to −6.9) −13.0 (−17.3 to −8.6)

PIP = potentially inappropriate prescription.

a

Adjusted for baseline differences and intracluster effect.

b

Total number of prescriptions issued for patients aged ≥70 years during baseline and follow-up periods, respectively.

c

Absolute change denotes differences between figures from before and after the intervention, while relative change represents this difference relative to the baseline figures.