Table 1.
Associations between HLA class I and leprosy.
Population | Study design | Sample size | Phenotype | Serotype, allele, or haplotype | Type of association | P or Pc | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethiopian | Case-control | 20TT, 19LL, 36 controls | TT | Aw21 | Susceptibility | Pc = 0.042 | [7] |
| |||||||
Indian | Case-control | 30BT or TT, 40 controls | TT | A9 | Resistance | Pc = 0.005 | [8] |
| |||||||
Thai | Case-control | 26TT, 183 controls | TT | A2 Bw17 |
Resistance Susceptibility |
0.01 < P < 0.05 0.01 < P < 0.05 |
[9] |
Case-control | 70LL, 183 controls | LL | B7 | Susceptibility | 0.01 < P < 0.05 | ||
| |||||||
Iran | Case-control | 88LD, 125 controls | LL | A1 B35 |
Resistance Susceptibility |
P < 0.05 | [10] |
| |||||||
Mumbai/Indian | Case-control | 158LL, 150TT, 170 controls | LL LL LL TT/LL TT/LL |
B-40 Aw19 A2-B40 A11-B40 A24-B40 |
Susceptibility Resistance Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility |
Pc = 0.0027 Pc = 0.02 P < 0.00025 P < 0.00025 P < 0.00025 |
[11] |
| |||||||
Japanese | Case-control | 295LL, 74TL, 110 controls | LL | B7 Bw54 |
Susceptibility Resistance |
Pc = 0.044 Pc = 0.016 |
[12] |
| |||||||
Korean | Case-control | 157LD, 162 controls | LD | A2 A11 Aw33 Cw5 |
Resistance Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance |
P = 0.03 P = 0.03 P = 0.003 P = 0.001 |
[13] |
| |||||||
Indian | Case-control | 65ENL, 71LL | ENL | A11 | Susceptibility | Pc = 0.0035 | [14] |
| |||||||
Indian | Case-control | 68LL, 237 controls | LL | B60 | Susceptibility | Pc = 0.00019 | |
Case-control | 138LD, 237 controls | LD | B60 | Susceptibility | Pc = 0.031 | [15] | |
Case-control | 20BB, 237 controls | BB | B40 | Susceptibility | Pc = 0.018 | ||
| |||||||
Southern Chinese | Case-control | 50LL, 69 controls | LL | B46 | Resistance | P < 0.01 | [16] |
| |||||||
Turkish | Case-control | 80LD, 120 controls | LD | A9 A10 Bw4 Bw6 Cw1 Cw2 A3 B49 |
Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance Resistance |
Pc = 0.0004 Pc = 0.0226 Pc = 0.00003 Pc = 0.00001 Pc = 0.0080 Pc = 0.0055 Pc = 0.0040 Pc = 0.0035 |
[17] |
| |||||||
Southern Indian | Case-control | 32LD, 67 controls | LD |
A*02:06
A*11:02 B*51 : 10 B*18:01 C*04:07 C*07:03 C*04:11 |
Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance |
Pc = 0.000007 Pc = 0.00001 Pc = 0.0000005 Pc = 0.007 Pc = 1.0 × 10−9 Pc = 0.000001 Pc = 0.001 |
[18] |
| |||||||
Mumbai/Indian | Case-control | 103LD, 101 controls | LD | A02 A11 A28 B12 B15 B40 Cw7 Cw3 |
Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance Resistance Resistance Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance |
Pc = 0.0015 Pc = 0.009 Pc = 0.0014 Pc = 0.001 Pc = 0.05 Pc = 7.34 × 10−7 Pc = 2.26 × 10−5 Pc = 0.0002 |
[19] |
Case-control | 32ML, 67 controls | ML |
A*02:06
A*11:02 B*18:01 B*51:10 C*04:07 C*04:11 C*07:03 |
Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance Susceptibility |
Pc = 7.15 × 10−5
Pc = 0.00001 Pc = 0.007 Pc = 5.29 × 10−6 Pc = 5.12 × 10−9 Pc = 0.001 Pc = 1.97 × 10−5 |
||
Case-control | 32ML, 67 controls | ML | A*11-B*40 | Susceptibility | Pc = 0.002 | ||
| |||||||
Brazilian | Case-control | 224LD, 446 controls | LD |
A*11
B*38 C*12 C*16 |
Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Resistance |
P = 0.0345 P = 0.0402 P = 0.01 P = 0.0124 |
[20] |
Case-control | 88LL, 48TT | LL |
C*07
B*35 C*04 |
Susceptibility Resistance Resistance |
P = 0.0211 P = 0.0156 P = 0.0464 |
||
| |||||||
Vietnamese | family study | 198 families | LD | C*15:05 | Susceptibility | P = 0.0063 | |
family study | 292 families | LD | C*15:05 | Susceptibility | P = 8.8 × 10−5 | [21] | |
| |||||||
Indian | Case-control | 364LD, 371 controls | LD | C*15:05 | Susceptibility | P = 3.0 × 10−8 |
MB: multibacillary leprosy; LL: lepromatous leprosy; BB: borderline borderline; TT: tuberculoid leprosy; ENL: erythema nodosum leprosum; LD: leprosy disease; ns: not significant; Pc: corrected P Value; Ref.: reference.