Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;10:77. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-77

Table 4.

Online performances

Participant
Completion time
Successful stops
Session
    mean ± std (sec) mean ± std breakdown
1
n=29
275 ± 45
6.2 ± 1.8
(26, 3)
 
Best: Day 5
298 ± 77
6.8 ± 2.3
 
 
Random Walk
227 ± 7
5.0 ± 1.3
 
2
n=25
271 ± 66
5.7 ± 2.3
(24, 1)
 
Best: Day 5
293 ± 26
8.1 ± 1.2
 
 
Random Walk
1445 ± 118
9.0 ± 0.9
 
3
n=24
277 ± 65
9.4 ± 1.3
(24, 0)
 
Best: Day 4
231 ± 8
10.0 ± 0.0
 
 
Random Walk
>1200
0.1 ± 0.25
 
4
n=19
289 ± 43
8.3 ± 1.8
(18, 1)
 
Best: Day 1
264 ± 12
8.9 ± 0.3
 
 
Random Walk
>1200
4.3 ± 0.7
 
5
n=27
258 ± 31
7.7 ± 2.1
(27, 0)
 
Best: Day 4
260 ± 17
10.0 ± 0.0
 
 
Random Walk
>1200
5.1 ± 1.4
 
All participants
273 ± 51
7.4 ± 2.3
(119, 5)
Physical joystick 205.72 ± 4.2 9.38 ± 0.95  

Average online performances, including completion time, and number of successful stops for each participant, upon achieving purposeful control, which was on day 2 for Participant 2, and on day 1 for all other participants. Note that the completion time consists of a fixed walking time (191 sec) and a variable amount of idling time. Also presented are the average online performances of each participant’s best experimental day. Performances of random walk are shown for comparison. Sessions are also broken down by number of purposeful and non-purposeful performances, i.e. (p<0.01, p≥0.01).