Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 25;9(7):e1003146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003146

Figure 2. The memory transfer model.

Figure 2

a. Upper left: In the model, the state of each synapse in stage one is updated stochastically in response to the occurrence of plasticity events. The synapses of downstream stages update their state according to the state of upstream stages. Lower left: Memories are encoded by subjecting the Inline graphic synapses in stage 1 of Inline graphic stages to a pattern of plasticity events, here illustrated by different colors. The correlation of synaptic states with a memory is initially zero in downstream stages, and builds up over time through feed-forward interactions. Right: The consolidation model always outperforms the heterogeneous model without interactions at sufficiently long times. Here a two-stage model is illustrated. The dashed line is the SNR of the second stage in the heterogeneous model. See text for details. b. The memory wave: the memory trace (from Eq. 1) in the consolidation model travels as a localized pulse from stage to stage (starting from Inline graphic, in fast learning stages, presumably localized in the medial temporal lobe, and ending at Inline graphic, in slow learning stages). Here Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Stage Inline graphic has a learning rate Inline graphic and Inline graphic. New memories are encoded at a rate of one per hour.