Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2013 Sep;20(9):911–921. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e3182829413

FIG. 4 — A: Percent change in daytime hot flash (HF) intensity, adjusted for baseline daytime HF intensity, by total daily dose and equol producer status weekly during the intervention. B: Percent change in nighttime HF intensity, adjusted for baseline nighttime HF intensity, by total daily dose and equol producer status weekly during the intervention. C: Mean percent change in daytime HF intensity, adjusted for baseline daytime HF intensity, by dosing frequency and equol producer status weekly during the intervention. D: Percent change in nighttime HF intensity, adjusted for baseline nighttime HF intensity, by dosing frequency and equol producer status weekly during the intervention.

FIG. 4 — A: Percent change in daytime hot flash (HF) intensity, adjusted for baseline daytime HF intensity, by total daily dose and equol producer status weekly during the intervention. B: Percent change in nighttime HF intensity, adjusted for baseline nighttime HF intensity, by total daily dose and equol producer status weekly during the intervention. C: Mean percent change in daytime HF intensity, adjusted for baseline daytime HF intensity, by dosing frequency and equol producer status weekly during the intervention. D: Percent change in nighttime HF intensity, adjusted for baseline nighttime HF intensity, by dosing frequency and equol producer status weekly during the intervention.