Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 15;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-31

Table 2.

DMFS outcome data at baseline and change in DMFS during the follow-up period for each tobacco group and residential-area household purchasing power group, with p-values for the tobacco group comparisons of change in DMFS

% low household purchasing power
Tobacco group
DMFS baseline 16 years
Change in DMFS, 16–19 years
 
    N Mean SiC* CF† N ΔMean ΔSiC ΔDMFS>0%‡ p-value§
< 10
Ever users
152
2.5
7.6
41.4
152
1.3
4.2
43.4
0.02
Never users
1553
1.7
6.5
49.8
1553
0.9
3.7
34.8
10-19.9
Ever users
382
3.3
7.3
30.1
382
1.6
4.2
51.8
< 0.001
Never users
2295
2.4
6.8
38.1
2295
1.0
3.8
38.2
20-29.9
Ever users
755
3.9
8.0
27.3
755
1.8
4.6
56.7
< 0.001
Never users
3826
3.0
7.8
35.8
3826
1.5
4.4
43.0
30+
Ever users
162
4.4
8.9
27.8
162
2.3
5.0
59.3
< 0.001
  Never users 892 3.7 8.8 32.2 892 1.5 4.6 46.0  

* Significant caries index based on DMFS.

† Proportion caries-free.

‡ Proportion with new caries during the observation period (16–19 years).

§ P-value from the Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test comparing the distributions of DMFS between ever vs. never users.

The overall p-value < 0.0001 (stratified Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test).