Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 25;8(7):e69333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069333

Table 3. Case-control association results.

Marker Allelesa MAFb Genotypes casesc Genotypes controlsc Pgenotypic value Pallelic value Ptrend value ORdominant (95% CI)d; p-value ORrecessive (95% CI)e; p-value
rs521417 a/C 0.38 111/112/36 182/244/67 0.2287 0.2835 0.2808 0.780 (0.54 – 1.060); 0.1125 1.026 (0.664 – 1.588); 0.9067
rs4712827 c/T 0.46 78/118/63 143/247/103 0.4277 0.6679 0.6716 0.948 (0.682 – 1.318); 0.7509 1.217 (0.851 – 1.740); 0.2809
rs494723 c/T 0.29 151/93/15 249/206/38 0.1165 0.0437 0.0426 0.730 (0.539−0.989); 0.0418 0.736 (0.397 – 1.365); 0.3292

Results of the Polish case-control association analysis. aUppercase denotes the more frequent allele in the control samples, bMAF, minor allele frequency calculated from the control samples, cThe order of genotypes: DD/Dd/dd (d is the minor allele), dDominant model: dd + Dd vs DD (d is the minor allele), eRecessive model: dd vs Dd + DD (d is the minor allele).