Skip to main content
. 2013 May 7;126(8):1951–1964. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2109-6

Table 1.

Parental-type molecular variant mean values for each marker, most significant marker or marker interval, LOD, measure of additive effects and percent regression effect explained from Multiple QTL Mapping using MapQTL in the Carberry/AC Cadillac doubled haploid population for DArT® and SSR markers with stem rust severity and infection response from the field in Njoro, Kenya and Swift Current, Canada, and for seedling stem rust infection type against race TTKSK from containment growth chamber trials in Morden, Canada

Chromosome QTL Trait Environment Markera/Marker interval LODb score Mean AC Cadillac molecular variant Mean Carberry molecular variant Additivec effect PVd  %
2B QSr.spa-2B.1 Stem rust severity Kenya 2010 wPt-6832 7.4 6.4 14 −3.8 10.3
QSr.spa-2B.1 Stem rust severity Kenya 2011 tPt-9065 7 10.3 12.6 −1.1 9.7
QSr.spa-2B.1 Stem rust infection response Kenya 2011 wPt-6832 3.7 1.7 3.4 −0.8 6.3
QPbc.spa-2B PBC Kenya 2010 Xwmc770 3.2 1.7 1.5 0.1 4.9
QPbc.spa-2B PBC Kenya 2011 Xwmc770 7.1 1.3 1.1 0.1 11.7
3B QSr.spa-3B.1 Stem rust infection response Canada 2011 Xbarc147 3 1.9 2.4 −0.2 4.6
QPbc.spa-3B PBC Kenya 2010 X3B042G11 8.1 1.8 1.4 0.2 13.7
QPbc.spa-3B PBC Canada 2012 wPt-744251 12 1.3 1 0.2 18
4B QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust infection type Morden 2012 wPt-744434Xwmc617 3.1 5.9 4.2 0.8 2.8
QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust infection response Kenya 2009 wPt-744434Xwmc617 2.9 4.8 3.7 0.5 2.4
QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust severity Kenya 2009 wPt-744434 4 12.3 7.9 2.2 5.8
QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust severity Kenya 2010 wPt-744434 4.5 13.4 7 3.2 6.1
QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust severity Canada 2011 wPt-744434Xwmc617 3.4 14.3 9 2.6 5.3
QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust infection response Canada 2011 wPt-744434Xwmc617 3 2.6 2 0.3 4.7
QSr.spa-4B.1 Stem rust infection type Morden combined wPt-733745 3 6.3 4.8 0.8 5.1
5A QSr.spa-5A Stem rust infection response Canada 2011 wPt-5408 2.9 2.5 2 0.2 4.5
QSr.spa-5A Stem rust severity Canada 2012 wPt-2175 3.2 3.7 2.1 0.8 5.5
QSr.spa-5A Stem rust severity Canada Combined wPt-666793 3.1 8.2 6 1.1 5.3
QSr.spa-5A Stem rust infection response Canada combined wPt-5256 3.4 2 1.6 0.2 5.9
5B QSr.spa-5B.1 Stem rust severity Kenya 2009 wPt-9205 3.6 8.2 12 −1.9 4.9
QSr.spa-5B.1 Stem rust infection response Canada 2011 wPt-5792 3.6 2 2.5 −0.3 5.4
6A QPbc.spa-6A PBC Canada 2012 wPt-2014tPt-8557 3.2 1.1 1.3 −0.1 4.4
6D QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection type Morden 2012 wPt-741955 34.7 2.5 7.5 −2.5 42.8
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection type Morden 2009 wPt-1695 39.2 2.7 7.5 −2.4 48.8
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection response Kenya 2009 wPt-1695 39.8 2.3 6.1 −1.9 47.8
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust severity Kenya 2009 wPt-664770 8.5 7 13.2 −3.1 12.8
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust severity Kenya 2010 wPt-741955 2.9 7.8 12.6 −2.4 3.9
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection response Kenya 2010 wPt-741955 13.4 1.6 3.4 −0.9 21.1
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection response Canada 2012 wPt-1695 3.4 1.1 1.4 −0.2 5.8
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection type Morden combined wPt-741955 9.4 3.8 6.4 −1.3 15
QSr.spa-6D Stem rust infection response Kenya combined wPt-741955 6.7 2.6 3.7 −0.5 11.1
7B QSr.spa-7B Stem rust infection type Morden 2012 wPt-3939 8.6 3.8 5.8 −1 7.1
QSr.spa-7B Stem rust infection type Morden 2009 wPt-3939 3.6 3.4 6.8 −1.7 3.2
QSr.spa-7B Stem rust severity Kenya 2009 wPt-3939 3.2 8.1 11.6 −1.8 4.3
7D QSr.spa-7D Stem rust infection type Morden 2012 Xwmc273 4.4 4.4 6 −0.8 3.8

aMarker interval described by the markers which immediately flank the peak QTL response, or in the case of a single marker, the marker which is at the peak QTL response

bThe threshold to declare LOD scores significantly ranged from 2.9 to 3.0. All LOD scores reported are significant

cA positive additive effect indicates Carberry contributed to stem rust resistance and a negative additive effect indicates AC Cadillac contributed to stem rust resistance

dPV is the proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL