Skip to main content
. 2013 May 7;126(8):1951–1964. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2109-6

Table 2.

Estimated additive × additive epistatic (A*A) effects of QTL detected by two-locus interaction analysis using QTL. Network for stem rust severity and infection response in the field in Kenya (2009, 2010, 2011), Canada (2011, 2012) and for seedling stem rust infection type against race TTKSK in growth chamber trials in Morden (2009 and 2012), Canada in the doubled haploid population derived from Carberry/AC Cadillac

Trait QTLa1 Flanking intervala1 QTLb2 Flanking intervalb2 A1*Ac2 effect
Stem rust severity QSr.spa-4B.1 wPt-744434Xwmc-617 QSr.spa-7B wPt-744769wPt-8561 −0.59*
QSr.spa-6D wPt-664770wPt-1695 QSr.spa-5B.1 tPt-3144Xwmc734 0.78**
Stem rust infection response QSr.spa-6D wPt-664770wPt-1695 QSr.spa-5B.1 wPt-664788wPt-9205 0.12**
QSr.spa-3B.1 wPt-7341wPt-7984 QSr.spa-6D Xcfd49Xcfd75 0.18***
QSr.spa-4B.2 wPt-2993wPt-1046 QSr.spa-5B.2 wPt-9724wPt-4736 −0.19***
Stem rust seedling infection type QSr.spa-6D wPt-664770wPt-1695 QSr.spa-7B wPt-3939wPt-5646 0.32**

aFirst QTL1 and interval of a pair of interacting QTL

bSecond QTL2 and interval of a pair of interacting QTL

cA1*A2 is the additive x additive interaction or epistatic effect across environments

Probability levels: * significant at 5 %; ** significant at 1 %, and *** significant at 0.1 %