. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 26.

Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;4(7):702–712. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.017

Table 3.

Thrombus Morphology in Relation to Echo Detection

A.

	LV Thrombus by DE-CMR (n=24)

	Echo + (n=8)	Echo − (n=16)	P

Type
Protuberant	7	10	0.06
Mural	1	6^*

B.
	Thrombus Size (cm³)
	Thrombus Detected	Thrombus Missed	P
Echo
Overall	6.6 [2.0, 21.4]	2.0 [1.2, 3.5]	0.054
Protuberant Thrombus	6.6 [2.0, 21.4]	1.3 [0.8, 2.3]	0.02
Cine-CMR
Overall	4.9 [2.6, 9.3]	1.4 [0.6, 3.0]	0.02
Protuberant Thrombus	4.9 [2.2, 11.0]	0.8 [0.5, 1.1]	<0.01

Indices reported as antilog of mean [95% confidence intervals] of log transformed data. Numbers in boldface indicate p values <0.05

In one case, DE-CMR detected mural thrombus adherent to mid anterior wall and excluded apical thrombus; echo was negative for anterior wall thrombus but positive for apical thrombus (P value based on thrombus detection by correct location).