Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jul 28;59(8):1531–1536. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03505.x

Table 1.

Decedent and Respondent Demographic Characteristics

Characteristic n (%)
Without Hospice
n = 278
Received Hospice “At the Right Time”
n = 208
Received Hospice “Too Late”
n = 33
Site of death
   Hospital 67 (24.1) 26 (12.5) 3 (9.1)
   Nursing home 208 (74.8) 146 (70.2) 26 (78.8)
   Assisted living facility 3 (1.1) 23 (11.1) 2 (6.1)
   Inpatient hospice facility 0 (0.0) 13 (6.2) 2 (6.1)
Decedent ethnicity
   Non-Hispanic white 222 (80.1) 174 (83.6) 28 (84.9)
   Non-Hispanic black 35 (12.6) 16 (7.7) 1 (3.0)
   Hispanic 12 (4.3) 15 (7.2) 3 (9.1)
   Other 8 (2.9) 4 (1.8) 1 (3.0)
Respondent sex
   Male 97 (35.0) 71 (34.1) 5 (15.2)
   Female 180 (65.0) 137 (65.9) 28 (84.9)
Respondent relationship to decedent
   Spouse 29 (10.4) 24 (11.4) 4 (12.1)
   Child 168 (60.4) 133 (64.0) 23 (69.7)
   Sibling 11 (4.0) 3 (1.4) 0 (0.0)
   Other relative 65 (23.4) 45 (21.6) 6 (18.2)
   Other 5 (1.8) 3 (1.4) 0 (0.0)
Respondent education
   <High school 16 (5.8) 10 (4.8) 1 (3.1)
   High school graduate 70 (25.4) 43 (20.8) 6 (18.8)
   Some college 94 (34.1) 59 (28.5) 14 (43.8)
   4-year college graduate 38 (13.8) 45 (21.7) 4 (12.5)
   >4-year college 58 (21.0) 50 (24.2) 7 (21.9)

Results are presented only for family members who stated that the decedent did not receive hospice services, received hospice services at the right time, or received hospice services too late. The four persons who stated that hospice was referred “too early” and the 15 who did not answer the question about the timing of hospice services were not reported in this table.