Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 19;13:672. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-672

Table 4.

Actions taken by the schools to prevent overweight

Outcome variable1 Baseline
Follow up
P-value2
(2006/2007)
(2010/2011)
% (n) % (n)
Actions taken to stimulate healthy eating behavior:
72 (127)
80 (140)
0.08
Healthy products are made less expensive than unhealthy products
26 (46)
30 (52)
Introduction of water coolers
15 (27)
26 (45)
Participation in national project “Healthy School Canteen Programme”
11 (19)
20 (35)
Canteen offers wide variety of healthy foods
28 (49)
30 (52)
Vending machines offers wide variety of healthy foods
17 (29)
19 (34)
Attempt to offer a good balance in food and beverages
34 (60)
46 (80)
After-school meetings organized on healthy diet
7 (13)
12 (22)
Other
16 (27)
20 (35)
Actions taken to discourage unhealthy eating behavior:
89 (155)
93 (161)
0.23
It is forbidden to sell certain unhealthy foods in the canteen
38 (65)
56 (98)
Parents are tackled about the eating behavior of their child
9 (16)
18 (32)
It is forbidden to eat in the classroom
79 (137)
87 (151)
Adding healthy products to vending machines
43 (75)
44 (76)
Regulation of media that stimulate less healthy eating behavior
4 (7)
1 (1)
Other
26 (45)
35 (60)
Actions taken to stimulate physical activity:
76 (135)
80 (142)
0.21
School stimulates the students to be physically active during breaks
20 (36)
17 (31)
Collaboration with sport associations
32 (57)
26 (46)
School often organizes activities for the students to be physical active after school hours.
62 (110)
57 (102)
School policy on physical activity active after school hours.
17 (31)
12 (21)
Other
8 (14)
26 (47)3
Actions taken to prevent overweight:
34 (49)
52 (74)
0.0009
After-school meetings organized on overweight
5 (7)
5 (7)
There are guidelines to identify ant to help students with overweight
15 (21)
14 (20)
Students who are overweight get more attention during physical activity classes
10 (14)
12 (17)
Other
13 (19)
49 (70)4
Regarding overweight in the future, school expects to pay
 
 
0.03
More attention
56 (98)
43 (76)
Equal attention
44 (77)
57 (100)
Less attention 1 (1) 0 (0)

1% yes (n) or otherwise indicated.

2 P for change. Changes in dichotomous outcome variables are tested using conditional logistic regression. Changes in ordinal outcome variables are analyzed by linear regression analysis. All models are adjusted for (changes in) school level and school size. To reduce the number of tests performed and the chance of false positive findings, it was a priori decided to only evaluate, but not test changes in specific actions undertaken by schools. P-values below 0.05 are considered to be statistically significant.

3 Includes 36 schools (20%) that indicated to have discussion with the local government about facilities to be physical active. This action is only queried at follow-up and not at baseline.

4 Includes 61 schools (43%) that indicated that they bring students with overweight and their parents in contact with (health) professionals. This action is only queried at follow-up and not at baseline.