Table 2.
Dependent variable (experienced sadness last month) | OR a (95% CI) Labor migrants |
OR b (95% CI) Other types of migrants |
---|---|---|
Overall sample | ||
Dichotomous comparison (migrants vs. rural non-migrants) | 1.99 *** (1.33, 2.99) | 1.26 (0.86, 1.85) |
By whether moving with other family members | ||
Yes (vs. rural non-migrants) | 1.57 (0.69, 3.54) | 1.53 (0.94, 2.50) |
No (vs. rural non-migrants) | 2.17 *** (1.37, 3.43) | 1.57 * (1.12, 2.22) |
N | 5,380 | 5,392 |
Males | ||
Dichotomous comparison (migrants vs. rural non-migrants) | 2.15 *** (1.24, 3.72) | 0.73 (0.36, 1.47) |
N | 2,369 | 2,350 |
Females | ||
Dichotomous comparison (migrants vs. rural non-migrants) | 1.84 *** (1.04, 3.27) | 1.74 * (1.08, 2.80) |
N | 3,013 | 3,042 |
Note: Adjusted odds ratios and confidence intervals are shown. Other covariates are omitted from the table. They include age, gender, years of education, marital status, household size, economic shocks, log per capital household income, province of residence, and whether the respondent initially reported poor health, all of which are measured in 1997 prior to migration.
The regression models compare psychological health between rural-urban labor migrants and rural non-migrants, with the latter being the reference category.
The regression models compare psychological health between rural-urban migrants for other purposes and rural non-migrants, with the latter being the reference category.
p value < 0.001;
p value < 0.01;
p value < 0.05