Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e70153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070153

Table 6. Comparison of methods’ sensitivity for tests performed with the CLIP-Seq data.

Method Features/Setup Data set #1 Data set #2
RF complete set 0.704 0.725
top 12 0.774 0.756
SVM complete set 0.464 0.549
top 12 0.901 0.891
NB complete set 0.591 0.657
top 12 0.633 0.689
KNN complete set 0.661 0.756
top 12 0.675 0.633
J48 complete set 0.521 0.586
top 12 0.732 0.743
GLM complete set 0.000 0.027
top 12 0.000 0.018
TargetSpy seed 0.421 0.339
no-seed 0.459 0.529

Data set #1 refers to interactions predicted by all softwares except miRanda (38 pairs).

Data set #2 comprises interactions predicted by all softwares, including miRanda (170 pairs).

Both TargetSpy tests were performed using the sensitivity as the threshold.