Table 2. Functional connectivity results related to criticism and associations with neuroticism.

Cluster	Seed region	Correlate	Cluster size	T-value	Z-value	Coordinate
						x	y		z
Criticism versus standard
1	Left superior frontal gyrus	Superior parietal gyrus/	87	4.83	4.30	−18	−64	44
		Precuneus		3.70	3.43	−20	−62	34
1*	Left superior frontal gyrus	Precuneus	303	4.82	4.30	10	−50	50
				4.18	3.81	10	−42	48
				4.14	3.78	0	−46	54
1*	Left superior frontal gyrus	Calcarine sulcus	124	4.55	4.10	26	−60	12
				4.43	4.01	22	−52	6
				3.84	3.55	16	−64	20
1*	Superior frontal gyrus (BA9)	Lingual gyrus/	172	5.45	4.74	−36	−52	−2
		Fusiform gyrus		4.52	4.07	−16	−44	−6
				4.49	4.05	−34	−60	−4
1	Superior frontal gyrus (BA9)	Superior parietal gyrus/	103	5.25	4.60	−16	−66	46
		Superior occipital gyrus/		4.29	3.90	−20	−64	38
		Precuneus
1*	Superior frontal gyrus (BA9)	Calcarine sulcus/	137	5.12	4.51	22	−52	6
		Lingual gyrus		4.77	4.26	32	−64	16
				4.48	4.04	26	−60	12
1*	Superior frontal gyrus (BA9)	Precuneus/	338	5.02	4.44	0	−46	52
		Middle cingulate gyrus		4.99	4.42	10	−44	52
				3.80	3.52	−6	−52	56
2*	Left inferior frontal gyrus	Precuneus	615	6.14	5.19	0	−56	50
				4.88	4.34	10	−44	48
				4.51	4.07	12	−58	46
2	Left inferior frontal gyrus	Lingual gyrus/	99	4.64	4.16	14	−54	8
		Calcarine sulcus/
		Precuneus
2	Left inferior frontal gyrus	Calcarine sulcus/	81	3.92	3.61	−2	−74	16
		Lingual gyrus		3.85	3.56	6	−64	16
				3.55	3.31	2	−60	8
2*	Left insula	Precuneus	217	4.09	3.74	6	−62	48
				3.88	3.58	14	−58	44
				3.88	3.58	8	−52	42
3*	Posterior cingulate gyrus/precuneus	Medial orbital frontal gyrus	133	6.30	5.29	2	50	−10
3*	Cuneus	Medial orbital frontal gyrus	323	6.23	5.25	0	54	-10
				5.37	4.68	0	46	−8
				4.51	4.06	−−12	52	−6
3*	Cuneus	Superior frontal gyrus/	158	5.36	4.68	−16	62	16
		Superior medial frontal gyrus		3.98	3.65	−12	62	6
4	Left amygdala	Superior medial frontal gyrus	125	4.23	3.85	−2	34	40
				4.10	3.75	6	30	48

Peak activations with corresponding T-values and Z-values of brain regions, which showed enhanced functional connectivity to our selected seed regions per cluster for the contrasts (criticism > standard), (standard > criticism) and (criticism > standard x neuroticism). Results were corrected on FWE cluster level (k>20) with an initial threshold of p<0.001 uncorrected. An asterisk (*) was used to denote clusters that survived multiple comparisons correction for applying thirteen seed regions (FWE cluster level (k>20) p = 0.05/13 = p<0.003).