Table 4.
Correlation between FL and HSA indices
CSA | CTh | SM | BR | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DXA-HSA in NN | ||||
FLSC | 0.70* | 0.70* | 0.49* | −0.52* |
FLFC | 0.68* | 0.66* | 0.60* | −0.52* |
DXA-HSA in IT | ||||
FLSC | 0.66* | 0.64* | 0.60* | −0.54*# |
FLFC | 0.78* | 0.73* | 0.71* | −0.65*# |
CT-HSA in NN | ||||
FLSC | 0.67* | 0.61* | 0.38* | −0.47* |
FLFC | 0.69* | 0.56* | 0.52* | −0.45* |
CT-HSA in IT | ||||
FLSC | 0.62* | 0.64* | 0.60* | −0.24*# |
FLFC | 0.77* | 0.71* | 0.68* | −0.29*# |
Values are Pearson's correlation coefficient.
CSA: bone cross-sectional area, SM: section modulus, CTh: average cortical thickness, BR: buckling ratio, NN: narrow neck region, IT intertrochanteric region, FL: fracture load, SC: stance configuration, FC: fall configuration.
*p<0.001.
#Significantly different between HSA-DXA and CT-DXA (p<0.001).