Table 2.
Latent class model comparisons and fit criteria | |||
---|---|---|---|
2 class | 3 class | 4 class | |
AIC | 974 | 970 | 978 |
BIC | 1028 | 1053 | 1090 |
cAIC | 1029 | 1054 | 1091 |
aBIC | 975 | 971 | 979 |
Smallest class size | 58 | 21 | 6 |
Table 2. Latent class model comparisons and fit criteria
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | % | n | Class 1 “Lower-Risk” Gamers (n=121, 68%) | Class 2 “Higher-risk” Gamers (n=36, 20%) | Class 3 “Sexual Regret” Gamers (n= 21, 12%) | p-value/ Effect Size |
Regretted Sexual Activity | 12% | 178 | 0% | 0% | 100% | p < .0001/ϕc=1.0 |
Had a Hangover | 44% | 178 | 26% | 100% | 48% | p < .0001/ϕc=.59 |
Got Physically Sick | 14% | 178 | 2% | 47% | 24% | p < .0001/ϕc=.52 |
Difficult to Limit Drinking | 11% | 178 | 5% | 36% | 0% | p < .0001/ϕc=.42 |
Rude/Obnoxious/Insulting | 8% | 178 | 3% | 25% | 5% | p = .0001/ϕc=.32 |
Unable to Recall Time | 15% | 178 | 5% | 36% | 33% | p < .0001/ϕc=.40 |
Passed Out | 3% | 178 | 0% | 8% | 10% | p = .0035/ϕc=.25 |
Drove Car after Drinking | 4% | 178 | 0% | 11% | 14% | p = .0002/ϕc=.30 |