Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Jun 30;124(4):517–529. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1002-8

Table 3.

Assessment sheet

Section Anatomical region Vacuolation size: S,M,C* Kuru type plaques yes/no Florid type plaques yes/no PrP synaptic yes/no PrP coarse/ peri vacuolar yes/no PrP plaque-like yes/no PrP perineuronal yes/no Comments
1. Cerebellum (Cbl) molecular cell layer **
granular cell layer
white matter
2. Frontal Cortex (FCtx)
3. Occipital Cortex (OCtx)
4. Hippocampus (Hipp) CA4
CA1/subiculum
5. Striatum (Str) caudate/putamen
*

S=small vacuoles, M=medium size vacuoles, C=Clusters of large confluent vacuoles. It can be either one or more (S or S+M or S+C and so on…)

**

Grey boxes are not required to be filled in.

1) Is there a clear-cut laminar pattern in the cerebral cortex (deep cortical layers more affected by spongiform change/PrP-deposits than the superficial ones)? (YES/NO): __________
2) Is there a significant relative sparing of the hippocampus compared to the occipital cortex? (YES/NO): __________
3) Is there a significant relative sparing of the cerebellum compared to the frontal cortex? (YES/NO): __________
4) Is there a moderate to severe atrophy of the medial thalamic nuclei without spongiform change? (YES/NO): __________
5) Is there a moderate to severe atrophy of the inferior olivary nuclei? (YES/NO): __________
Classification of CJD type (tick one box): graphic file with name nihms484361t1.jpg
COMMENTS: _______________