Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 6;48(4):1487–1507. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12020

Table 2.

Percent Reduction (Increase) in Sample Mean Difference (Treated–Untreated) from PS Methods for the Measured Covariate XM, and the Independent Portions of the Unmeasured Covariates Affecting Treatment Choice R1, R3, and R4

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 Scenario 7 Scenario 8
XM
 Binning* 95.5% 95.7% 93.5% 94.9% 91.1% n/a n/a n/a
 Matching 85.7 95.4 98.9 97.7 99.1 99.2% 99.0% 98.4%
 Weighting 100.8 101.3 122.6 100.0 61.3 22.7 16.8 15.0
R1
 Binning* −4.4 −20.0 −81.5 −42.0 −157.4 n/a n/a n/a
 Matching −3.9 −19.6 −76.1 −40.0 −130.2 −323.5 −720.0 −2,200.0
 Weighting −4.6 −21.9 −117.9 −53.3 −88.6 −75.0 −33.3 −66.7
R3
 Binning* −4.5 −20.3 −82.8 −41.5 −155.1 n/a n/a n/a
 Matching −3.8 −19.7 −75.6 −28.0 −134.9 −343.8 −730.0 −2,300.0
 Weighting −4.6 −21.4 −111.0 −51.6 −101.2 −71.9 −70.0 −40.0
R4
 Binning* −4.2 −19.9 −83.3 −41.3 −155.3 n/a n/a n/a
 Matching −4.2 −18.5 −74.4 −38.5 −131.4 −334.4 −740.0 −2,500.0
 Weighting −4.9 −21.6 −111.3 −53.8 −95.3 −68.8 −60.0 −70.0
*

Average across 5 PS-quintile “bins,” n/a when not all five bins contained patients.

For match tolerance value = 0.01 (for matched portion of total sample only).