. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 29.

Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Sep 7;176(1):24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.08.031

Table III.

Percent difference in Ki due to single versus dual mode for each rat. Non-shaded values in the right most column reflect average effects of scan mode. Shaded results show additional comparisons of dual versus single in microPET P4 without one or more corrections but are not included in the global average because they are from the same rats in rows 1 and 2.

Rat	Attenuation & Scatter Correction	Scanner	Ki Single (sec⁻¹)	Ki Dual (sec⁻¹)	Effect of Scan Mode (%)
1	all	microPET-P4	0.0155	0.0140	9.7
2	all	microPET-P4	0.0092	0.0095	−3.3
1	attenuation only	microPET-P4	0.0158	0.0146	7.6
2	attenuation only	microPET-P4	0.0095	0.0101	−6.3
1	none	microPET-P4	0.0102	0.0090	11.8
2	none	microPET-P4	0.0062	0.0063	−1.6
3	none	IndyPET-II	0.0074	0.0064	13.5
4	none	IndyPET-II	0.0077	0.0068	11.7
5	none	IndyPET-II	0.0080	0.0080	0.0
6	none	IndyPET-II	-	0.0071	-
			Average		6.3
			StDEV		7.5