Skip to main content
. 2013 May 29;19(17-18):1960–1971. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0455

Table 2.

Histological Scoring Evaluation

Sample
HA-FIB
HA-FIB-B3.75
HA-FIB-B5
Time point 1 week 3 week 6 week 1 week 3 week 6 week 1 week 3 week 6 week
Scoring categories
1. Intensity 0.82±0.98 1.82±0.87 2.70±0.48 0.67±0.78 1.82±0.60 3.00±0.00 1.00±1.00 1.91±0.54 2.64±0.50
2. Density 0.55±0.69 1.36±0.50 2.10±0.57 1.00±0.95 1.64±0.47 2.27±0.65 1.00±0.89 1.91±0.83 2.45±0.69
3. Morphology 1.27±1.35 1.82±0.40 2.50±0.53 1.08±1.00 1.73±0.67 2.91±0.30 1.36±1.29 2.00±0.63 2.55±0.69
4. Uniformity 0.55±0.69 1.64±0.50 2.20±0.63 0.92±1.00 1.64±0.50 2.55±0.69 0.91±0.94 1.36±0.50 2.00±1.00
5. Calcifications 3.00±0.00 3.00±0.00 2.40±0.52 3.00±0.00 3.00±0.00 2.91±0.30 3.00±0.00 3.00±0.00 3.00±0.00
6. Vascularization 2.67±0.71 1.22±0.67 1.38±0.74 3.00±0.00 1.78±0.67a 2.78±0.44b 2.78±0.44 1.89±0.60a 2.67±0.50b
Final score 8.85±2.06 10.86±1.39 13.28±1.43 9.76±1.87 11.6±1.32 16.41±1.13c 10.05±2.13 12.07±1.41a 15.3±1.57b

Statistical differences evaluated between the scaffolds with and without bevacizumab at each time point.

a

p<0.05.

b

p<0.01.

c

p<0.001.