Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2009 Aug 4;104(11):1864–1873. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02660.x

Table 2.

Ukraine Sex Risk Behaviors – Baseline to 6 month change for CE-only and CE+ILOM

CE Only
CE + ILOM
Variable Baseline 6
month
FU
Test
Statistic
p-value Baseline 6
month
FU
Test
Statistic
p-value
Multiple
Partners1
26.6 18.9 27.27 <0.001 24.6 21.1 5.03 0.025
Sex with
an IDU1, 2
37.8 36.3 0.70 0.403 44.0 36.5 14.89 0.001
Sex with
HIV+
partner or
dk
34.3 26.7 18.00 <0.001 38.3 30.4 16.54 <0.001
Unsafe
(without
condom)
sex2
49.6 40.0 24.02 <0.001 56.4 43.5 41.04 <0.001
Sex risk
composite2
70.8 62.9 19.41 <0.001 75.8 67.1 21.27 <0.001
1

The Intervention Group by Time interaction was statistically significant at p < 0.05..

2

CE-Only group significantly differed from CE+ILOM at baseline but not at follow-up at p < 0.05.