Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Biotechnol. 2011 May 5;29(8):399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.03.006

Table 2.

A few important and relevant parameters for choosing (or to avoid choosing) the appropriate micro- nanofabricated platform for specific stem cell based experiments.

Platform Techniques Some Useful Numbers Notes
Microfluidics Photolithography Chamber height1: 10–500μm Minimum feature size2: 5–10μm Length of culture: 2 days 3D culture: difficult Ease of handling: moderate High throughput: yes 1. High chamber height reduces shear.2. Small feature size allow efficient packing of device.
Stereolithography Chamber height1: 100–1000μm Minimum feature size2: 25μm Length of culture: 7–10 days 3D culture: easy Ease of handling: easy High throughput: difficult
Microstencils Ease of handling1: very easy Size of “holes”: 5–500μm Cell types: 2–3 Shape of cell-cell interface: arbitrary Incorporation in microfluidics: difficult 1. Small size of holes present difficulty in introducing cells.
Nanofabrication Capillary force lithography Feature size1: >10nm Sample size2: 5cm Shape of features: arbitrary Material compatibility: UV assisted polymerization Length of culture: 1–21 days Ease of handling: very easy Cost: low Microscopy: any Incorporation in microfluidics: easy 1. Possibility to obtain smaller feature size allow a higher flexibility to create a more biomimetic ECM microenvironment.2. Large sample size allow biochemical experiments.
Electrospinning Feature size: 10–100nm Sample size1: >1cm3 Shape of features: grooves Material compatibility: limited Length of culture: 1–15 days Ease of handling: moderately easy Cost: moderate Microscopy: confocal 1. Electrospinning allows only 3D samples.
Nanoimprinting Feature size: 10–100nm Sample size1: >1cm3 Shape of features: grooves, pillars Material compatibility: UV or thermal curable materials Microscopy: any Cost: moderate Incorporation in microfluidics: easy Nanoimprinting equipment is required.
Mechanical Gradients in Microfluidics Polyethylene glycol (PEG) gradients FDA approved: yes Range of rigidity1,86: 50–500kPa Mode of polymerization: UV/chemical Ease of preparation: moderately difficult Ease of ECM coating: moderately easy 1. Range of rigidity achieved by change in cross-linker concentration.
Polyacrylamide gradients FDA approved: no Range of rigidity1,86: 0.01–100kPa Mode of polymerization: UV/chemical Ease of preparation: moderately easy Ease of ECM coating1: difficult 1. ECM coating on PAAM presents complications.
PDMS gradients FDA approved: no Range of rigidity86: 10–1000kPa Mode of polymerization: UV/chemical Ease of ECM coating: easy Ease of preparation: moderately difficult Ease of gradients: difficult
Nanofabrication of polymers Ease of preparation1: difficult Ease of handling: easy Gradient shape: arbitrary Ease of ECM coating: easy 1. Unlike microfluidics based gradient generation, nanofabricated samples require complex fabrication procedures.