Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;75(4):306–310. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0492-x

Table 3.

Post operative wound dehiscence in various studies comparing different suture materials

Study conducted by Year % age of wound Dehiscence Suture material
Mann et al. [10] 1962 2.73 Conventional
Bentley et al. [11] 1978 0.5 Dexon
White et al. [12] 1977 1.5 Catgut, steel, nylon
Murray and Blaisdell [13] 1978 <1 PGA and Vicryl®
Cameron et al. [14] 1980 0.60 Prolene® & Dexon
Mathur SK [15] 1983 0 Nylon
Chowdhury et al. [16] 1994 0, 3.75 Nylon, chromic catgut
Shittu et al. [17] 1995 9.7 Nylon
Brolin et al. [18] 1996 18, 10 Ethibond®, PDS®
Sahlin et al. [19] 2005 1, 1 Polyglyconate (Maxon), Vicryl®
Bloemen et al. [20] 2011 20.2, 24.9 Prolene®, PDS®
Present study 2011 6,17 Prolene®, Vicryl®