Table 3.
Study conducted by | Year | % age of wound Dehiscence | Suture material |
---|---|---|---|
Mann et al. [10] | 1962 | 2.73 | Conventional |
Bentley et al. [11] | 1978 | 0.5 | Dexon |
White et al. [12] | 1977 | 1.5 | Catgut, steel, nylon |
Murray and Blaisdell [13] | 1978 | <1 | PGA and Vicryl® |
Cameron et al. [14] | 1980 | 0.60 | Prolene® & Dexon |
Mathur SK [15] | 1983 | 0 | Nylon |
Chowdhury et al. [16] | 1994 | 0, 3.75 | Nylon, chromic catgut |
Shittu et al. [17] | 1995 | 9.7 | Nylon |
Brolin et al. [18] | 1996 | 18, 10 | Ethibond®, PDS® |
Sahlin et al. [19] | 2005 | 1, 1 | Polyglyconate (Maxon), Vicryl® |
Bloemen et al. [20] | 2011 | 20.2, 24.9 | Prolene®, PDS® |
Present study | 2011 | 6,17 | Prolene®, Vicryl® |