Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Artif Intell Med. 2013 Jun 2;58(3):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.04.008

Table 3.

Performance of confidence methods for classic glioma (21 samples: 14 class 1, 7 class 2)a.

LEVEL N POS ACC SEN SPC PPV NPV
Overall 21.0(0.2) 33.4(0.4) 85.2(5.6) 72.9(9.2) 91.4(6.8) 82.4(12.2) 87.1(3.9)
Method 1
Highest NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Intermediate NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lowest 21.0(0.2) 33.4(0.4) 85.2(5.6) 72.9(9.2) 91.4(6.8) 82.4(12.2) 87.1(3.9)
Method 2
Highest 19.8(1.2) 34.2(3.0) 86.3(6.5) 76.0(10.6) 92.0(7.0) 84.6(12.2) 87.8(5.9)
Intermediate 0.1(0.3) 0.0(0.0) 100.(0.0) NA 100.(0.0) NA 100.(0.0)
Lowest 1.1(1.1) 15.5(25.7) 75.0(42.7) 0.0(0.0) 78.6(42.6) 0.0(0.0) 75.0(42.7)
a

Please refer to footnote for Table 1.