Table 1.
Study | Ages of participants | Regions | Design (quadrants sampled) | Eligible destinations | Total sample size: All routes | Reliability pair sample size: # routes (# segments, # crossings, # cul-de-sacs) | Years of MAPS data collection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIK |
6-11 and a parent |
San Diego County, CA and Seattle/King County, WA |
Activity EnvironmentaX Nutrition Environmentb |
Cluster of ≥3 destinations (commercial locations, parks or schools) |
San Diego County: 365 |
San Diego County: 76 (233, 117, 16) |
San Diego County: 2009 |
Seattle/King County: 393 |
Seattle/King County: 0 (0, 0, 0) |
Seattle/King County: 2009-2010 |
|||||
TEAN |
12-16 and a parent |
Seattle/King County, WA and Baltimore, MD-DC |
WalkabilitycXIncomed |
Cluster of ≥3 commercial locations, a park, or a school |
Seattle/King County: 427 |
Seattle/King County: 72 (167, 67, 31) |
Seattle/King County: 2010 |
Maryland-DC: 470 |
Maryland-DC: 106 (42, 100, 6) |
Maryland-DC: 2009-2010 |
|||||
SNQLS | 65-97 | Seattle/King County, WA | WalkabilitycXIncomed | Cluster of ≥3 destinations (commercial locations, parks, or school) | Seattle/King County: 462 | Seattle/King County: 36 (74, 35, 0) | Seattle/King County: 2009 |
a Defined by block group walkability and park access.
b Defined by the presence or absence of grocery stores and fast food restaurants.
c Walkability index defined by GIS-derived residential density, intersection density, retail floor area ratio, and mixed use.
d Based on 2000 census data for block group median household income.