Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 27;13:403. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-403

Table 4.

Route subscale characteristics: all studies combined (n = 290 route reliability pairs)

Subscale # items (range of scores) Sample items* and overall subscale description Mean (SD) ICC, % agreement Range of item ICCs or Kappas
Land Use and Destinations Subscales
 
 
 
 
Positive Subscales
 
 
 
 
 
Residential Mix (weighted residential density)
4 (0–3)
Single family homes, apartments/condominiums, apartments above street retail
1.34 (.64)
.577, 80.0%
.292 (retirement/senior living facilities) - .776
Commercial-Shops
10 (0–11)
Food-related land uses, retail and service-oriented land uses and shopping centers
1.37 (2.25)
.873, 74.2%
.407 -.842
Commercial-Restaurants/Entertainment
4 (0–6)
Food-related uses (fast food, sit-down, café), entertainment
.799 (1.31)
.842, 81.3%
.765-.796
Institutional/Services-Professional Services
3 (0–6)
Bank/credit union, health-related professional, other services
1.26 (1.54)
.849, 75.3%
.743-.808
Institutional/Services-Religious, Schools (each a single item)
1 each (0–2 each)
Government or community land use: Place of worship; school
N/A
Religious: .712
Schools: .722
Same as subscales
Government Services
4 (0–4)
Health or social services, library/museums, post office, senior center
.135 (.436)
.652, 91.4%
.279 (senior center) -.798
Parking Structures (positive influence on PA)
2 (0–2)
No parking facilities present, parallel/angled on-street parking
1.61 (.79)
.736, 80.0%
-.011 (no parking) -.689
Recreational Land Use-Public Recreation Facilities
4(0–3)
Community garden, public indoor, public outdoor pay, public park
.179 (.466)
.717, 91.6%
.497-.679
Recreational Land Use-Private Recreation Facilities
2 (0–2)
Private indoor, private outdoor
.097 (.34)
.696, 95.5%
.659-.704
DLU Commercial (an interim subscale, may be used independently, but not included in overall scores)
3 subscales (0–21)
Sum of shops, restaurant/entertainment, and services subscales. Subscale created to reflect most common pedestrian destinations. Not included in overall positive subscale.
3.39 (4.40)
.889, 50.3%
See above
DLU Overall Positive Subscale
10 subscales (2–24)
Sum of subscales: residential mix, shops, restaurants/entertainment, services, government services, religious, schools, positive parking, public recreation, and private recreation.
7.08 (4.51)
.855, 43.8%
See above
Negative Subscale
 
 
 
 
 
Adverse Land Uses: Industrial, Abandoned Lot/Building, Surface Parking Lot or Garage **ALSO IS DLU Overall Negative
6 (0–7)
Warehouse/factory/industrial, abandoned building, large parking facilities
1.17 (1.24)
.610, 96.3%
-.029 (abandoned building)-.659
Overall Subscale
 
 
 
 
 
DLU Overall Subscale Score
2 subscales (0–21)
DLU Overall Positive subscale – Adverse Land Uses subscale
5.91 (4.71)
.801, 37.7%
See above
Streetscape Subscales
 
 
 
 
 
Positive Elements Subscale
18 (0–10)
Transit stops, posted speed limit, pedestrian signage, street amenities (e.g., working telephone, trash bins)
3.70 (2.16)
.741, 49.8%
.395 (presence of kiosks or info booths) - .838
Negative Elements Subscale
5 (0–4)
High speed limits, roll-over curbs, driveways
1.69 (.876)
.742, 70.1%
.433-.814
Overall Streetscape Score
2 subscales (−3 – 10)
Positive Streetscape Elements subscale– Negative Streetscape Elements subscale
2.01 (2.66)
.762, 45.7%
See above
Aesthetics and Social Subscales
 
 
 
 
Positive Aesthetics and Social Subscale
5 (0–5)
Public art, landscaping maintenance
2.08 (1.09)
.632, 48.7%
.391 (signage for commercial destinations or parks) -.689
Negative Aesthetics and Social Subscale
14 (0–8)
Graffiti, physical disorder, broken windows
1.91 (1.81)
.514, 36.6%
.088 (social disorder (dichot: none vs. any) -.665
Overall Aesthetics and Social Score
2 subscales (−8 – 5)
Positive Aesthetics and Social -Negative Aesthetics and Social Subscales
0.18 (2.52)
.580, 29.5%
See above
Total Route Score 3 overall subscales (−2 – 33) Sum of 3 overall scores 7.94 (8.18) .816, 17.4% See above

*All item reliabilities can be found at: http://sallis.ucsd.edu.