Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 30;8(7):e69220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069220

Table 2. Evaluation results on ErbB signaling.

LP model DEPN random
TP 9 6 14.72
TN 71 71 58.72
FP 15 15 27.28
FN 33 36 27.28
SP 0.83** 0.83** 0.68
SN 0.21** 0.14** 0.35
PR 0.38 0.28 0.35
AC 0.63 0.60 0.57

Shown are comparative performance measurements for network inference on reverse phase protein array data regarding ErbB signaling in breast cancer cells. Network inference was performed using our linear programming (LP) approach, Deterministic Effects Propagation Networks (DEPN), and random guessing of a network. Results were compared with a gold standard network from the String database. TP  =  true positives, TN  =  true negatives, FP  =  false positives, SP  =  specificity, SN  =  sensitivity, PR  =  precision, AC  =  accuracy. Statistically significant differences are marked with Inline graphic(Inline graphic) and Inline graphic(Inline graphic), respectively.