Table 4.
Statistics for 10 lowest energy structures of Ca2+-RasGRP2EF
| Type of restraint | Number of restraints | Violations per structure | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total NOEs | 653 | 0 (> 0.5 Å) | |
| Intraresidue | 221 | 0 | |
| Sequential NOEs | 299 | 0 | |
| Medium-range NOEs | 78 | 0 | |
| Long-range NOEs* | 55 | 0 | |
| R.m.s deviations from experimental distance restraints (Å) | 0.044 ± 0.0005 | ||
| Hydrogen bond restraints | 27 | ||
| Dihedral angle restraints (ϕ, ψ and χ1)† | 137 | 0 (>5°) | |
| R.m.s deviations from experimental dihedral restraints (°) | 0.503 ± 0.1219 | ||
| Dipolar coupling restraints (Hz)‡ | |||
| NH | 68 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | |
| Cα-Hα | 29 | 3.15 ± 0.07 | |
| Structure quality factor – overall statistics§ | |||
| Mean score | SD | Z-score | |
| Procheck G-factor (phi/psi only) | 0.07 | N/A | 0.59 |
| Procheck G-factor (all dihedral angles) | −0.29 | N/A | −1.71 |
| Verify3D | 0.20 | 0.0424 | −4.17 |
| Prosall (-ve) | 0.28 | 0.0395 | −1.53 |
| MolProbity clashscore | 30.77 | 3.6352 | −3.75 |
| Deviation from idealized covalent geometry | |||
| Bonds (Å) | 0.0019 ± 0.00003 | ||
| Angles (°) | 0.3178 ± 0.0013 | ||
| Impropers (°) | 0.4386 ± 0.0196 | ||
| Average pairwise RMSD (Å)§ | |||
| All heavy atoms | 1.0 | ||
| Backbone heavy atoms | 0.5 | ||
| Ramachandran plot statistics (%)# | |||
| Most favored region | 93.4 | ||
| Additionally allowed region | 6.6 | ||
Sidechains coordinating the Ca2+ ion in EF hands 1 and 2 were implemented as distance restraints.
χ1 angles were obtained from PREDITOR (Berjanskii et al., 2006), and ϕ and ψ angles were calculated using TALOS+ (Shen et al., 2009).
The r.m.s differences (Hz) between the experimental RDC data and back-calculated RDCs from the 10 lowest energy structures were obtained by SVD fitting using the program PALES (Zweckstetter and Bax, 2000).
The pairwise RMSD for residues 421-486 and structure quality factor were generated using the Protein Structure Validation Software suite v1.4 (Bhattacharya et al., 2007).
The Ramachandran statistics were evaluated for residues 422-486 with PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1996).