Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surgery. 2013 Aug;154(2):179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.016

Table 4.

Multivariate Analysis: Factors Associated with Preoperative Biliary Stenting

Factor Odds Ratio 95% CI
Patient Demographics
Age (per year) 0.99 0.97–1.01
Year of Diagnosis 1.09 1.06–1.12
Male (Female) 1.14 0.92–1.41
Race
 White 0.95 0.61–1.47
 Hispanic 1.27 0.45–3.59
 Black Reference Reference
 Other 0.88 0.47–1.66
Married (Unmarried) 1.13 0.91–1.41
Income quartiles
 Quartile 1 Reference Reference
 Quartile 2 1.29 0.93–1.80
 Quartile 3 1.15 0.78–1.71
 Quartile 4 1.05 0.67–1.67
Education
 Quartile 1 Reference Reference
 Quartile 2 1.24 0.89–1.72
 Quartile 3 1.20 0.82–1.76
 Quartile 4 1.01 0.66–1.57
SEER Region*
 Atlanta 1.72 0.83–3.55
 Connecticut 2.02 1.10–3.71
 Detroit 1.66 0.93–2.97
 Greater California 1.90 1.09–3.31
 Hawaii 1.11 0.44–2.80
 Iowa 1.48 0.80–2.74
 Kentucky 2.62 1.36–2.05
 Louisiana Reference Reference
 Los Angeles 2.02 1.10–3.71
 New Jersey 1.79 1.01–3.15
 New Mexico 0.84 0.33–2.12
 San Francisco 1.53 0.75–3.12
 San Jose 1.94 0.92–4.06
 Seattle 3.89 1.98–7.65
 Utah 3.37 1.66–6.88
Preoperative Signs/Symptoms
Jaundice (no jaundice) 5.53 4.40–6.95
Cholangitis (no cholangitis) 6.33 3.98–10.08
Pruritus (no pruritus) 1.58 1.02–2.45
Coagulopathy (no coagulopathy) 2.119 0.53–8.44
Tumor Characteristics and Treatment
Tumor size (per 10 mm) 0.99 0.98–0.99
Stage
 Localized Reference Reference
 Regional 1.26 0.90–1.78
 Distant 1.10 0.64–1.90
Differentiation (N=2,229)
 Poor (vs. No) 0.87 0.70–1.08
Nodal status (N=2,304)
 Positive 1.10 0.87–1.40
 Negative Reference Reference
Neoadjuvant therapy
 Yes (vs. No) 2.71 1.58–4.66
Gastroenterologist visit before surgeon visit
 Yes (vs. No) 1.80 1.46–2.22
*

Louisiana was chosen as reference because of low usage of preoperative biliary stenting amidst a sizable patient population. Rural Georgia was excluded because of few patients (N=3).