Table 1.
Index | Linear trend (days ± 1SE) | r2 | Fdf | P-value | Linear model ΔAICcnull |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initiation date | −0.10 ± 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.141,14 | 0.72 | +3.02 |
Renesting date* | −0.66 ± 0.21 | 0.44 | 10.071,13 | 0.007 | −5.42 |
Average lay date | −0.12 ± 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.261,14 | 0.62 | +2.89 |
Termination index* | −0.97 ± 0.15 | 0.77 | 42.501,13 | <0.0001 | −18.59 |
Breeding season length index* | −0.51 ± 0.22 | 0.30 | 5.471,13 | 0.04 | −2.09 |
Predation date | 0.03 ± 0.37 | <0.01 | 0.011,14 | 0.93 | +3.17 |
Predation date of 1st attempts | 0.07 ± 0.46 | <0.01 | 0.021,14 | 0.88 | +3.16 |
Proportion of nests predated | −0.007 ± 0.005 | 0.14 | 2.281,14 | 0.15 | +0.77 |
Mayfield estimate of predation | 0.008 ± 0.005 | 0.15 | 2.481,14 | 0.14 | +0.58 |
Linear and quadratic models were compared for each response variable by assessing the change in Akaike's Information Criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) with respect to the null model, where a negative ΔAICcnull indicates evidence of a temporal trend; linear models were always more parsimonious than quadratic ones, and linear trends are therefore displayed with associated statistics.
denotes variables showing evidence of a temporal trend (P < 0.05 and negative ΔAICcnull).