Skip to main content
. 2013 May 24;3(7):1992–2001. doi: 10.1002/ece3.536

Table 1.

Estimates of larval asymptotic size (α) for each of the 64 treatments

Dam type
Low temperature High temperature
Sire type Canada Colombia Georgia India Canada Colombia Georgia India
Uncontrolled density
 Canada 6.03 (5.59–6.47) 6.67 (6.15–7.19) 6.08 (5.97–6.20) 6.12 (5.78–6.12) 5.69 (4.64–6.75) 4.74 (4.40–5.08) 6.70 (6.37–7.03) 6.12 (5.65–6.59)
 Colombia 6.76 (5.91–7.60) 7.33 (6.51–8.16) 6.81 (6.64–6.98) inviable 5.82 (4.89–6.66) 7.87 (7.32–8.42) 5.82 (5.41–6.22) inviable
 Georgia 6.30 (5.82–6.78) 7.01 (6.81–7.22) 6.93 (6.65–7.20) 6.74 (6.61–6.87) 6.89 (5.86–8.09) 6.20 (5.40–7.00) 6.09 (5.97–6.20) 6.35 (6.16–6.54)
 India 6.00 (4.48–7.51) inviable 6.13 (5.80–6.46) 7.74 (7.26–8.22) 6.37 (4.37–8.36) 2.72 (2.59–2.84) 6.41 (6.01–6.82) 5.95 (5.82–6.08)
Controlled density
 Canada 5.51 (4.88–6.13) * 6.55 (6.06–7.03) 5.32 (5.19–5.45) 5.62 (5.08–6.16) * 5.37 (5.10–5.65) 5.23 (4.93–5.53)
 Colombia * 6.39 (6.16–6.62) 7.08 (6.49–7.68) inviable * 5.98 (5.60–6.36) 5.59 (5.30–5.89) inviable
 Georgia 4.85 (2.52–7.18) 6.34 (6.00–6.67) 5.92 (5.25–6.58) 7.24 (6.49–8.00) 7.16 (1.19–13.12) 6.36 (5.70–7.02) 5.43 (3.98–6.88) 5.12 (4.73–5.52)
 India 5.55 (4.85–6.25) inviable 8.51 (6.16–10.86) 6.55 (6.23–6.87) 5.59 (4.58–6.59) 3.03 (2.81–3.25) 6.46 (5.97–6.95) 5.77 (5.35–6.19)

All estimates correspond to millimeters (mm).

*

designates insufficient biological samples for the model to achieve convergence, low temperature: 26°C, high temperature: 34°C.