Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;3(7):2378–2391. doi: 10.1002/ece3.596

Table 5.

Best-fit function and concavity of best-fit decline curves caused by low, constant proportional pressure (P1), under different scenarios of time-series quality degradation

Best-fit function (out of 1000 simulations) Concavity (out of 1000 simulations)


Degradation type Specific degradation Linear (%) Quadratic (%) Exponential (%) Concave (%) Convex (%)
Years either side of pressure 25 (None) 6.9 42.8 50.3 88.2 11.8
Years either side of pressure 20 6.6 37.4 56 89.7 10.3
Years either side of pressure 15 5.6 35.9 58.5 89.4 10.6
Years either side of pressure 10 8.8 23.3 67.9 90.8 9.2
Years either side of pressure 5 0.1 43 56.9 100 0
Years after pressure 20 7.4 38 54.6 88.2 11.8
Years after pressure 15 4.4 36.7 58.9 87.4 12.6
Years after pressure 10 8.9 28.4 62.7 87.6 12.4
Years after pressure 5 5.5 39.1 55.4 83.8 16.2
Years before pressure 20 9.9 38.4 51.7 90.5 9.5
Years before pressure 15 4.6 42 53.4 90.7 9.3
Years before pressure 10 5.8 38.6 55.6 93.3 6.7
Years before pressure 5 6.8 36.4 56.8 97.9 2.1
Years before pressure 2 18.8 68.9 9.6 59.5 40.5
Years between monitoring 1 6.2 39.2 54.6 88.8 11.2
Years between monitoring 2 7.8 43.4 48.8 88.7 11.3
Years between monitoring 3 9.5 43 47.5 88.3 11.7
Years between monitoring 5 21.3 44 34.7 67.6 32.4
Years between monitoring 8 21.5 61.9 16.6 50.2 49.8
Magnitude of observation error 1 15.8 51.5 32.3 78.7 21.3
Magnitude of observation error 1.5 12.5 62.5 24.4 78.3 21.7
Magnitude of observation error 2 10.8 65.4 21.9 76.7 23.3
Magnitude of observation error 2.5 12.8 72 13.3 70.8 29.2