Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;3(7):2378–2391. doi: 10.1002/ece3.596

Table 6.

Best-fit function and concavity of best-fit decline curves in medium life-history speed populations affected by increasing, fixed pressure (F3), under different scenarios of time-series quality degradation

Best-fit function (out of 1000 simulations) Concavity (out of 1000 simulations)


Degradation type Specific degradation Linear (%) Quadratic (%) Exponential (%) Concave (%) Convex (%)
Years either side of pressure 25 (None) 1.7 98.3 0 1 99
Years either side of pressure 20 15.5 84.5 0 5.8 94.2
Years either side of pressure 15 14.4 85.5 0.1 6.6 93.4
Years either side of pressure 10 13.7 86 0.3 5.5 94.5
Years either side of pressure 5 4.2 95.5 3 7 93
Years after pressure 20 15.4 84.5 0.1 7.8 92.2
Years after pressure 15 16.9 82.8 0.3 8.8 91.2
Years after pressure 10 16.9 82.7 0.4 6.2 93.8
Years after pressure 5 4.9 94 1.1 10.3 89.7
Years before pressure 20 12.5 87.5 0 3.7 96.3
Years before pressure 15 11.1 88.8 0.1 5.4 94.6
Years before pressure 10 12.5 87.5 0 5.5 94.5
Years before pressure 5 11.6 88.4 0 3.3 96.7
Years before pressure 2 12.4 87.5 0.1 5.6 94.4
Years between monitoring 1 13.9 85.9 0.2 8.1 91.9
Years between monitoring 2 14.3 85.5 0.2 6.5 93.5
Years between monitoring 3 10.1 89.8 0.1 6.1 93.9
Years between monitoring 5 9.9 89.8 0.3 5.4 94.6
Years between monitoring 8 5.8 94.2 0 0.7 99.3
Magnitude of observation error 1 4.3 95.6 0.1 8 92
Magnitude of observation error 1.5 4.7 95 0.3 7.6 92.4
Magnitude of observation error 2 3.7 95.8 0.5 11.2 88.8
Magnitude of observation error 2.5 3.8 96.1 0.1 11 89