Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 24;2(1):6–9. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2011.2.1.001

Table 1. Similarities and differences between APSED (2005) and APSED (2010).

Area APSED (2005) APSED (2010)
Vision and goal   • Focus on addressing urgent need for managing emerging infectious diseases.   • Emphasis on collective responsibility for regional health security through addressing both emerging diseases and other acute public health emergencies.
Objectives      • Five interlinked objectives:    • Five interlinked objectives:
→ risk reduction → risk reduction
→ early detection → early detection
→ rapid response → rapid response
→ effective preparedness → effective preparedness
→ partnerships → partnerships
Focus areas      • Five programme areas:    • Eight focus areas (original 5 + 3 new focus areas):
→ surveillance and response → public health emergency preparedness (national)
→ laboratory → regional preparedness, alert and response
→ zoonoses
→ infection control → monitoring and evaluation
→ risk communications
Scope      • Emerging infectious diseases    • Emerging infectious diseases and beyond
Time frame      • 2006–2010   • 2011–2015
Process of development      • A top-down approach with various assessments and evaluations in supporting implementation and building on lessons from SARS.    • A bottom-up approach with intensive national and regional consultations and building on lessons from the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 pandemic.
Approach for implementation      • A step-by-step approach to ensure the minimum capacity components are in place.      • Defining a clear vision for each focus area and stages towards the vision.
     • A standard approach (less flexibility in implementing activities).      • A non-standard approach (more flexibility in designing and implementing activities).
     • Focus on more resource-limited countries.      • Continuing efforts for resource-limited countries, but also full participation of all countries and areas.