Table 3.
OR of MetS and corresponding 95%CIs on tertiles of factor scores from a PCFA
| Nutrient pattern |
Tertiles of dietary nutrient pattern factor score |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Middle | High | P for trend | |
| Vitamin B group | ||||
| Model 1 |
1 |
0.47 (0.24, 0.95) |
0.38 (0.18, 0.76) |
0.007 |
| Model 2 |
1 |
0.21 (0.08, 0.57) |
0.16 (0.05, 0.47) |
0.001 |
| Protein and lipids | ||||
| Model 1 |
1 |
0.37 (0.19,0.75) |
0.98 (0.49, 1.96) |
0.96 |
| Model 2 |
1 |
0.43 (0.16, 1.14) |
1.20 (0.46, 3.14) |
0.71 |
| Vitamin E and minerals | ||||
| Model 1 |
1 |
0.90 (0.45, 1.79) |
0.73 (0.37, 1.44) |
0.36 |
| Model 2 |
1 |
1.64 (0.63, 4.25) |
0.73 (0.29, 1.86) |
0.51 |
| Antioxidant vitamins | ||||
| Model 1 |
1 |
3.24 (1.56, 6.73) |
1.30 (0.65, 2.63) |
0.46 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 2.89 (1.04, 7.96) | 2.22 (0.82, 5.94) | 0.11 |
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking status and physical activity level.
Model 2 was adjusted for all the aforementioned factors as well as BMI.