Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2013 Jun 30;16(8):1068–1076. doi: 10.1038/nn.3446

Figure 6. VIP cells preferentially inhibit Sst cells.

Figure 6

a) Schematic of experimental configuration: ChR2 expressing VIP-Cre cells are photo-stimulated while recording from a pyramidal cell (Pyr) and a neighboring GAD65/67 positive inhibitory neuron expressing GFP.

b) Example IPSCs simultaneously recorded in the reference pyramid (black) and in one of the six different interneuron categories (different colors). The order of the six pyramid IPSCs (top to bottom) matches the order of the IPSC simultaneously recorded in each of the six interneuron categories. For simplicity, all traces were scaled such that the pyramid IPSCs have the same peak amplitude.

c–h) The inhibitory postsynaptic charge (IPSQ) evoked by VIP cell photostimulation and recorded in individual interneurons (IPSQIN; y-axis) is plotted against the IPSQ simultaneously recorded in a pyramidal cell (IPSQPyr; x-axis; see (a) for symbol legend). Dotted line is unity line. Note that only Sst cells receive substantial inhibition (d). Also, note the x and y-axes are expanded by one order of magnitude as compared to Pvalb-Cre (Fig. 4) and Sst-Cre (Fig. 5). Category(n of cells/slices/mice): Pvalb(29/20/12), Sst(11/8/6), VIP(20/14/8), Tnfaip8l3(18/12/8), Undefined-UD(7/5/4), L1(6/5/4).

i) Panel showing mean±s.e.m of individual neuronal contributions (INC) of all recorded pairs of the respective category.

j) Schematic illustration of the inhibition mediated by VIP cells onto each interneuron category (abbreviation as in Fig. 2e).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure