Skip to main content
. 2012 May 24;26(3):255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.04.005

Table 1.

Summary of case series of pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment spanning from 1959 to 2006. Baseline characteristics, risk factors, surgical approach, and outcomes are detailed.

Case series Years Location of case series Number of eyes (patients) Age cutoff Age distribution % Male Trauma (%) Congenital (%)h Prior surgery (%) Myopia (%) Uveitis (%) Bilateral detachment (%) Fellow eye pathology (%), non-trauma Initial acuity Macula involving (%) GRT (%) PVR at least grade C (%) Initial SB (%) Initial SB/PPV (%) Initial PPV (%) Total lensectomy (%) Total PPV (%) % Of total eyes with SO placement % of PPV eyes with SOl Mean surgeries Single surgery anatomic success (%) Final anatomic success % Final acuity
Hudson5 1959–1964 London, UK 35 (32) 15 72% >10 NR 51 NR NR 34 0 9 NR 50% <20/200 NR 3 NR 45 Total procedures 0 0 0 0 No PPV No PPV 1.9 NR 71 71% 20/200 or better
Scharf and Zonis7 1964–1973 Haifa, Israel 27 (27) 20 74% >10 81 44 NR NR 30 3.7 28 73 NR NR 0 NR 28 Total procedures 0 0 0 0 No PPV No PPV 1.3 NR 78 NR
Winslow and Tasman8 1966–1974 Philadelphia, USA 187 (179)d 16 NR 73 44 NR 12 15 2.7 30% of myopes 56.5% of myopes 73.4 <20/200 77 NR NR 100 0 0 0 0 No PPV No PPV 1.2 For successful eyes 66 80 58% 20/200 or better in reattached eyes
Okinami et al.14 1966-1985 Moriguchi, Kyoto and Suita Japan 908 (802) 19 7% <10, 29% 10–14, 64% 15–19 74 26 NR NR 53 NR 14.6 NR NR NR, 21% involved 4 quadrants NR NR 87 NR 2.7j NR NR NR NR (NR) NR NR 83 NR
Haring and Wiechansa,12 1980–1994 Kiel, Germany 33 (31) 18 1 Patient <10 54 24f Excluded 9 42 Excluded 8 NR 39% >20/40 45 0 PVR excluded from study 100 0 0 0 3 NR No PPV (NR) 1.2 88 100 61% >20/40
Rumelt et al.b,6 1980-2000 Jerusalem, Israel 144 (127)e 18 Mean 10.8 73 42 62 10 14 NR 16 NR 70% <20/400 77 13 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (NR) NR NR 52 37% >20/400
Wang et al.17 1983-2003 Taoyuan, Taiwan 296 (278) 18 13% 0–10, 36% 11–15, 51% 16–18 74 30.7 16.6 5.1 79.1 0 NR NR Median 20/600 81 5 46 76 19 5 NR 30.7 9 25 (29) 1.34 72 85 Median 20/100
Yokoyama et al.9 1988-2001 Hiroshima, Japan 55 (49) 15 Mean 12 86 27f 16 (13% FEVR) 2 25 0 NR NR Median 0.3 NR 1.8 22 76 0 24 NR 27 NR NR (NR) NR 78 87 (42 in cases with PVR) Median 0.7
Chang et al.14 1989-2003 Taipei, Taiwan 152 (146) 18 Mean 13.1 70 32.9 11.8 5.9 37.5 3.9 6 NR NR 73 6.6 18.4 61.2 NR 38.8j NR 44.1 32.2 71.2 (73.1) 1.5 58.5 78.3 42.8% improved by 2 or more lines
Akabane et al.3 1991–1996 Sakura, Japan 32 (28) 15 Mean 12.8 65 21.9 15.6 (all FEVR) 9.4 37.5 0 NR NR 65.6% >20/400 6.3 37.5 78 0 22 NR 31 NR NR (NR) NR 88 94 90.6% 20/200 or better
Fivgas and Capone2 1991–1997 Atlanta, USA 29 (27) 18 Mean 9.6 70 42g 45 34 34i, 4 with myopia alone 3.5 22 89 24% >20/800 79 14 45 28 NR 72j NR 92 72 44 (78) 2.2 NR 72 41% >20/800
Weinberg et al. 18 1991–2000 Chicago, USA 39 (34) 18 Median 10 79 36 53 51 total, 28 excluding trauma related surgery NR, none with myopia alone 15 26 (includes trauma) NR Median CF 74 15 31 41 46 13k NR 67 23 NR (35) 1.6 53 79 Median 20/400
Chen et al. 10 1995–2004 Changhua City, Taiwan 35 (32) 15 Median 13 75 23 49 (20% FEVR) 2.9 60i, 23 myopia alone 0 22 (29% excluding trauma) NR NR 91 8.6 5.7 65.7 22.9 0 26 28.6 5.7 25 (20) 1.4 65.7 80 37% 20/50 or better, 17% NLP
Soheilian et al.15 1997–2005 Tehran, Iran 127 (108) 18 Mean 12.1 81 44.3 39.3 (11% Stickler) 7.9 9.4 0 18 (27.4 excluding trauma) 85 44% ⩾20/200 80 NR 45 31 63 0 44 74.8 65.4 NR (86.5) 1.55 58 74.9 37% ⩾20/200
Kocaoglan et al.13 2003c Ankara, Turkey 30 (29) 18 Mean 13.6 NR 43.3 6.6 3.3 29 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR, excluded >C2 100 0 0 NR NR NR NR (NR) NR 83.3 96.6 NR
Gonzales et al.11 2001–2006 Los Angeles, USA 46 (45) 18 Median 9 71 43 35 61 total, 30 excluding trauma related surgery 17i 4.3 18, (includes trauma) 37 Median CF 83, 58% total RD 20 59 26 30 44 55 NR 56.5 NR (88) NR 52 78 (88) 44% ⩾20/200
Wadhwa et al.16 2006c New Delhi, India 230 (216) 18 Mean 11.12 81.9 34.3 24.3i 3.9 14.3i 0.40% 16.2 (includes trauma) NR 27% ⩾20/200 98 NR 44.8 37 NR 63j NR 69 69 100 (100) 1.98 NR 88.7 30% ⩾20/200

NR: not reported; GRT: giant retinal tear; PVR: proliferative vitreoretinopathy; SB: scleral buckle (any type); SB/PPV: scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy; PPV: pars plana vitrectomy; SO: silicone oil.

a

Study assessed scleral buckle only in non-complex retinal detachment.

b

Series includes exudative detachments.

c

Date of publication or submission, dates of surgeries not included.

d

Outcomes reported for only 117 eyes of 109 patients, who were followed for >6 months.

e

115 eyes with RRD.

f

Perforating trauma excluded from study.

g

Traumatic cases excluded from other analysis.

h

Excluding congenital disorders leading to surgery with no vitreoretinal disorder; unless otherwise noted, includes cicatricial ROP and inherited syndromes such as Stickler and Marfan.

i

Stickler, Marfan, and ROP included in myopia group as well as congenital except for Wadhwa et al. where these cases were considered only in the myopia group.

j

Not clear if SB/PPV done in some of these cases.

k

Surgeons performed scleral buckle as part of initial surgery except for one case of macular hole as etiology of RRD, scleral buckle not placed in other cases because they were deemed inoperable.

l

Percentage of eyes undergoing PPV as part of initial surgery with placement of silicone oil during initial surgery (percentage of eyes undergoing any vitrectomy with any placement of silicone oil).