Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 15;2013:426134. doi: 10.1155/2013/426134

Table 2.

Maximum stress values in models to which vertical and oblique forces were applied.

Restoration type Base Vertical force Oblique force
Max. Enamel Dentin Max. Enamel Dentin
Model 1 Buccal + palatinal cusps capping RMGI 23,2576 23,2576 7,47318 48,1163 48,1163 16,8935
Model 2 Palatinal cusp capping RMGI 23,2593 23,2593 7,46765 52,6151 52,6151 18,3603
Model 3 MOD restoration RMGI 23,2844 23,2844 7,48487 52,6108 52,6108 18,3592
Model 4 Woven fiber RMGI 24,279 24,279 7,41309 52,7324 52,7324 18,3862
Model 5 Buccal + palatinal cusps capping Fluid composite 25,019 25,019 7,99823 49,32 49,32 17,2984
Model 6 Palatinal cusp capping Fluid composite 25,0536 25,0536 7,99245 49,3576 49,3576 17,3073
Model 7 MOD restoration Fluid composite 25,078 25,078 8,01069 53,8333 53,8333 18,7693
Model 8 Woven fiber Fluid composite 26,1037 26,1037 7,94491 53,9383 53,9383 18,7906
Model 9 Buccal + palatinal cusps capping No base 22,0818 22,0818 7,15808 51,6907 51,6907 18,0553
Model 10 Palatinal cusp capping No base 22,083 22,083 7,15272 48,4006 48,4006 16,6957
Model 11 MOD restoration No base 22,1082 22,1082 7,16925 51,7573 51,7573 18,0709
Model 12 Woven fiber No base 23,2833 23,0794 7,09289 44,0467 44,0467 15,1938