Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 23;9(4):20130036. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0036

Table 1.

Allometric regression analyses of clutch in mass in birds for linear fits presented in figure 1. N is number of species, and CI is confidence interval. Italicized terms are significantly different than others with groups p < 0.05. See text.

N N orders intercept 95% CI slope 95% CI r2 p
all
 paternal 29 2 −0.2502 −0.5051–0.0046 0.8956 0.8064–0.9848 0.94 <0.00001
 maternal 642 11 −0.1735 −0.2170–−0.1300 0.8816 0.8597–0.9034 0.91 <0.00001
 bi-parental 583 23 0.1497 0.0868–0.2126 0.6641 0.6394–0.6889 0.83 <0.00001
 precocial 270 6 0.0888 −0.0392–0.2169 0.8219 0.7760–0.8679 0.82 <0.00001
 altricial 984 18 0.1036 0.0731–0.1341 0.6640 0.6497–0.6784 0.89 <0.00001
maternal
 precocial 150 4 0.6298a 0.4365–0.8232 0.6672 0.6014–0.7330 0.73 <0.00001
 altricial 492 7 0.1126 0.0710–0.1541 0.6539 0.6278–0.6800 0.83 <0.00001
bi-parental
 precocial 91 6 0.2705 0.0705–0.4706 0.7038 0.6236–0.7841 0.77 <0.00001
 altricial 492 18 0.1201 0.0596–0.1806 0.6598 0.6360–0.6835 0.86 <0.00001
paternal
 precocial 29 2 −0.2502 −0.5051–0.0046 0.8956b 0.8064–0.9848 0.94 <0.00001
 ratites 17 1 0.0813 −0.3630–0.5257 0.8128 0.6807–0.9450 0.92 <0.00001
 Charadriiformes 12 1 0.3711 −0.4030–1.1451 0.5237 0.1220–0.9253 0.46 0.0157

aDifferent from bi-parental precocial.

bDifferent from maternal and bi-parental precocial.