Table 2.
| MCF-10F | E2 | C5 | T4 | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invasiveness | 162 ± 11 | 683 ± 48 | 1322 ± 145 | 503 ± 231 | ≤0.001a |
| Ductulogenesis in collagen matrix | 31.8 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | ≤0.001b |
| Mass formation in collagen | |||||
| <250 nm | – | 334 ± 9.4 | 12 ± 2 | 41.7 ± 4 | ≤0.001c |
| >250 nm | – | 24 ± 8.6 | 1 ± 0.4 | 13.1 ± 1.9 | 0.044d |
| Colony forming in agar | |||||
| <250 μm | 191.5 ± 8.5 | 619.2 ± 53.7 | 281.7 ± 29 | 113 ± 20 | 0.01e |
| >250 μm | – | – | 175 ± 20 | 91 ± 6.6 | 0.008f |
ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak test was used for the comparisons of above-mentioned values except colony formation (bottom line) and results were expressed as ±SEM (standard error of the mean)
C5 cells showed higher invasion rates than the others
MCF-10F cells showed higher rate of ductal formation in collagen matrix when compared to the other groups. The comparison between E2 and C5 was also significant. No mass formation was observed in cultured MCF-10F cells
The highest values observed in E2 cells. The all comparisons were significant
E2 values were higher than C5. Other comparisons were insignificant
Mean colony numbers in E2 group were significantly higher than other groups. In addition, the comparison between C5 and T4 groups was statistically significant. However, other comparisons were insignificant (ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak test). Other group comparisons in the aspect of colony formation in agar-methocel were insignificant
Colony formation bigger than 250 μm was observed in C5 and T4 groups. Mean colony number in C5 group was statistically higher than T4 (Student t test)