Table 6. Cases of significant cooperative influence of secondary motifs other than VFL, TRL, re-examined after “partialing out” the effect of accessibility scores.

Data set	M2	Distance Threshold	SPCC(M1)	SPCC(M1+M2)	ΔSPCC
BIN_Fchip_s10_11	ADF1	150	0.646	0.675	0.028
D_Mseq_s5_11	ADF1	30	0.364	0.375	0.011
D_Mseq_s5_11	HLHM5	150	0.364	0.423	0.059
D_Mseq_s5_11	MAD	30	0.364	0.382	0.017
D_Mseq_s5_11	TTK	150	0.364	0.453	0.088
EN_Mchip_s5_14	TTK	30	0.359	0.401	0.043
EN_Mchip_s5_14	TTK	150	0.359	0.403	0.044
HB_Bchip_s9	ADF1	30	0.284	0.328	0.045
MED_Bchip_s14	CG10267	150	0.102	0.217	0.115
MED_Bchip_s14	RIB	30	0.102	0.267	0.165
MED_Bchip_s14	TTK	150	0.102	0.162	0.060
MED_Bchip_s5	DEAF1	30	−0.046	0.000	0.047
MED_Bchip_s5	HB	30	−0.046	0.029	0.075

This list only shows secondary motifs corresponding to top 10–15% most highly expressed TF genes (marked with asterisks in Table 3). SPCC(M1) and SPCC(M1+M2) denote CC of a single-motif STAP model and a two-motif STAP model with cooperativity, both after partialing out accessibility. Bold font in the last column refers to cases where ΔSPCC is ≥0.04.