Table 2. Model fit to data.

	Kjetland et al [3], [7]	Model
FGS prevalence (95% CI)	46.1% (41.8–50.5)	45.5% (43.6–48.1)
HIV prevalence (95% CI)	28.1% (24.0–32.5)	29.6% (26.0–32.0)
Odds Ratio (95% CI)	2.1 (1.2–3.5)	2.1 (1.5–2.8)

FGS prevalence, HIV prevalence, and odds ratio of the association between FGS and HIV from the 1999 cross-sectional epidemiological study among rural Zimbabwean women [3], [7] and model predictions.