Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;4(4):491–497. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0260-x

Table 1.

Performance characteristics per patient and per polyp

Analysis according to patient (with polyps ≥6 mm) Sensitivity Specificity
(% [95 % CI])
  Radiographer R1 76.2 [54.9–89.4] 81.8 [70.9–89.3]
  Radiographer R2 71.4 [50.0–86.2] 83.3 [72.6–90.4]
  Radiographer R3 85.7 [65.4–95.0] 81.8 [70.9–89.3]
  Radiographer R4 71.4 [50.0–86.2] 78.8 [67.5–86.9]
  Radiologist R5 66.7 [45.4–82.8] 87.9 [77.9–93.7]
  Radiologist R6 85.7 [65.4–95.0] 74.2 [62.6–83.3]
Average reader values
  Radiographers 76.2 [61.4–91.0] 81.4 [73.7–89.2]
  Radiologists 76.2 [61.7–90.6] 81.1 [73.8–88.3]
Analysis according to polyp Sensitivity
Size category ≥6 mm ≥10 mm
  Radiographer R1 53.8 [39.9–67.8] 50.0 [27.3–72.7]
  Radiographer R2 56.4 [40.3–72.5] 61.5 [37.4–85.7]
  Radiographer R3 71.8 [61.2–82.4] 60.0 [38.8–81.2]
  Radiographer R4 59.0 [44.3–73.6] 71.4 [50.1–92.8]
  Radiologist R5 51.3 [36.7–65.9] 66.7 [45.3–88.0]
  Radiologist R6 67.6 [48.9–86.3] 71.4 [43.4–99.4]
Average reader values
  Radiographers 60.3 [50.3–70.3] 60.7 [42.2–79.2]
  Radiologists 59.2 [46.4–72.0] 69.0 [48.1–89.6]