Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;4(4):491–497. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0260-x

Table 2.

Analysis of the positive and negative predictive values per patient

Analysis according to patient (with polyps ≥6 mm)
Positive predictive value
  Radiographer R1 57.1 [39.1–73.5]
  Radiographer R2 57.7 [38.9–74.7]
  Radiographer R3 60.0 [42.3–75.4]
  Radiographer R4 51.7 [34.4–68.6]
  Radiologist R5 63.6 [43.0–80.3]
  Radiologist R6 51.4 [35.6–67.0]
Average reader values
  Radiographers 56.6 [40.1–73.2]
  Radiologists 56.1 [40.0–72.3]
Negative predictive value
  Radiographer R1 91.5 [81.6–96.3]
  Radiographer R2 90.2 [80.2–95.4]
  Radiographer R3 94.7 [85.6–98.2]
  Radiographer R4 89.7 [79.2–95.2]
  Radiologist R5 89.2 [79.4–94.7]
  Radiologist R6 94.2 [84.4–98.0]
Average reader values
  Radiographers 91.5 [85.2–97.8]
  Radiologists 91.5 [85.4–97.5]