Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 28;22(6):1415–1426. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0272-x

Table 5.

Model fit indices summary for single-group and multiple-group comparisons

Model type Constraints SB χ2 df RMSEA RMSEA (90 % CI) CFI TLI Model comparison ∆SB χ2 df P value ∆CFI
Factor structure in single group
 1. Interviewer administration None 799.64 485 0.0647 (0.0566, 0.0726) 0.963 0.960 NA NA NA NA NA
 2. Self-administration None 1066.81 485 0.0716 (0.0658, 0.0774) 0.977 0.975 NA NA NA NA NA
Multiple-group comparisons
 3. Full configural invariance Factor structure 1804.21 970 0.0665 (0.0617, 0.0712) 0.962 0.958 NA NA NA NA NA
 4. Full metric invariance Factor structure, factor loadings 1837.51 998 0.0658 (0.0610, 0.0705) 0.962 0.959 3 vs 4 33.29 28 0.225 0.000
 5. Full scalar invariance Factor structure, factor loadings, intercepts 1964.54 1026 0.0686 (0.0640, 0.0731) 0.957 0.956 3 vs 5 127.04 28 0.000 -0.005
 6. Partial scalar invariance Factor structure, factor loadings, intercepts (GF1, GP3, GS3 freely estimated) 1862.34 1023 0.0649 (0.0603, 0.0696) 0.962 0.960 4 vs 6 24.83 25 0.472 0.000
 7. Partial strict factorial invariance Factor structure, factor loadings, intercepts (GF1, GP3, GS3 freely estimated), error variance (GF1, GP3, GS3 freely estimated) 1839.99 1053 0.0620 (0.0573, 0.0667) 0.964 0.964 6 vs 7 22.35 30 0.841 0.002

SB Satorra–Bentler, df degree of freedom, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, CFI comparative fit index, TLI Tucker–Lewis index