Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 23;3(7):e003280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003280

Table 4.

Percentages of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment in participants with one or both eyes with axial length <21 mm (n=96) compared with all EPIC-Norfolk participants with no eye of axial length <21 mm (n=7920) by Fisher's exact test

LogMAR Snellen equivalent Classification EPIC-Norfolk participants without small eyes (n=7920 total) EPIC-Norfolk participants with small eyes (n=96 total)
p Value
n Prevalence (95% CI) n Prevalence (95% CI)
>1.30 better eye <3/60; 20/400 WHO blindness 2 0.03% (0.00, 0.06) 1 1.0% (0.0, 3.1) 0.036
>0.48 better eye <6/18; 20/60 Blindness and visual impairment; ‘low vision’ 45 0.6% (0.4, 0.7) 2 2.1% (0.0, 5.0) 0.11
>0.22 better eye <6/10; 20/32 UK driving standard 422 5.3% (4.8, 5.8) 7 7.29% (2.0, 12.56) 0.36
>0.30 better eye <6/12; 20/40 Previous visual impairment studies, American driving standard 259 3.3% (2.9, 3.7) 5 5.2% (0.7, 9.7) 0.25
>1.0 worse eye <6/60; 20/200 Unilateral visual impairment 120 1.5% (1.3, 1.8) 11 11.5% (5.0, 18.0) <0.001
>0.48 worse eye <6/18; 20/60 Unilateral visual impairment 470 5.9% (5.4, 6.5) 24 25.0% (16.2, 33.8) <0.001
>0.30 worse eye <6/12; 20/40 Unilateral visual impairment 1341 16.9% (16.1, 17.8) 29 30.2% (20.9, 39.6) 0.001

Bilateral visual impairment is defined as both eyes with a visual acuity less than the respective value and unilateral visual impairment as one eye with a visual acuity less than the respective value.

EPIC, European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.