Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 2;8(8):e70252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070252

Table 4. Risk of bias of included clinical outcome studies.

Study: Cassity 1976 37 Odell-Miller et al 200684 Silverman & Marcionetti 200496 Silverman 2009a100 Silverman 2011a102 Silverman 2011b103 Talwar et al. 2006116 Ulrich et al 2007118 Moe et al 200073 Morgan, et al 201174
Experimental Study Design Controlled study RCT Pre-Post Controlled study Pilot RCT 2 Pilot RCTs RCT RCT Pre-Post RCT
Score/27 (%) (Downs & Black, 1998) 11 (40.7) 16 (59.3%) 10 (37%) 19 (70.4%) 17 (62.9%) 17 (62.9%) 24 (88.9%) 22 (81.5%) 16 (59.3%) 23 (85.2%)
Reporting Hypothesis/aim/objective Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Clear description of- Main outcomes to be measured Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Patient characteristics No explicit exclusion criteria No explicit exclusion criteria No explicit exclusion criteria No explicit exclusion criteria No explicit exclusion criteria No explicit exclusion criteria Yes Yes Yes Yes
Intervention Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Distribution of principal confounders No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Main findings No data for subject rank Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Estimates of random variability in data for main outcomes Not reported Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
All adverse events No No No No No No No No Yes No
Characteristics of patients lost to followup Not reported Yes Not reported Not reported Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Actual probability values reported Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Not reported Yes
External Validity Subjects approached representative of entire population Unable to determine Yes Unable to determine Yes Unable to determine Yes Yes Unable to determine Unable to determine Yes
Participants representative of entire population Unable to determine Unable to determine Unable to determine Unable to determine Unable to determine Unable to determine Yes Unable to determine Unable to determine Yes
Staff and facilities representative of treatment usually received Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Internal validity Subjects blinded to intervention No No No No No No No No No Yes
(bias) Measurers of main outcomes blinded No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes
Unplanned analyses reported No unplanned analyses Yes No unplanned analyses Yes No unplanned analyses Yes No unplanned analyses No unplanned analyses No unplanned analyses No unplanned analyses
Adjustment of different lengths of follow-up Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up Yes Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up Same time period for follow up
Appropriate statistical tests to assess main outcomes Yes Yes Unable to determine Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Reliable compliance with intervention Unable to determine Yes Yes Yes Unable to determine Yes Yes Yes Yes Unable to determine
Accurate outcome measures (valid and reliable) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Main outcome valid and reliable. Additional measures not outlined in method. Yes Yes Yes Yes
Internal validity (confounds) Recruitment of intervention and control from same population Yes Yes No control group Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No control group Yes
Recruitment over same period of time for control and intervention Yes Yes No control group Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No control group No- quasi random by month
Randomisation to groups Unable to determine No- alternate allocation No Yes No- quasi random by intervention Study 1- unable to determine; Study 2- randomised by session Yes- block randomised stratified for site, derived from computer program Yes- randomised to intervention or control by throw of dice Not randomised No- quasi random: 1 month intervention then 1 month control
Concealment of randomisation Unable to determine No Not randomised No No No Concealed from staff, not patients Concealed from staff, not patients Not randomised Yes
Adjustment for confounding No No No Yes No statistically significant differences between groups regarding number of times in hospital or age. Yes Yes Yes No No significant differences between groups
Loss of patients to follow up taken into account No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes